- Warren Buffet
- Abraham Lincoln
- Charlie Chaplin
- Mary Anne Radmacher
- Alice Walker
- Albert Einstein
- Steve Martin
- Mark Twain
- Michel Montaigne
- Voltaire
Find most favourite and famour Authors from A.A Milne to Zoe Kravitz.
The best solution to income inequality is providing a high-quality education for everybody. In our highly technological, globalized economy, people without education will not be able to improve their economic situation.
Ben Bernanke
China is growing very quickly and is clearly becoming an important player in the world economy.
Banks will have to win the confidence of their customers through fair dealing, making good loans, and remaining financially healthy.
The Fed's independence is critical.
Long term, I have a lot of confidence in the United States. We have an excellent record in terms of innovation. We have great universities that are involved in technological change and progress. We have an entrepreneurial culture, much more than almost any other country.
To the extent that bank panics interfere with normal flows of credit, they may affect the performance of the real economy.
Actually, I'm a Republican.
In a slow-growing world that is short on aggregate demand, Germany's trade surplus is a problem.
If you take a candy bar in the short run, it gives you a burst of energy, but after a while, it just makes you fat.
Interest rates are used to achieve overall economic stability.
A little humility never hurts.
All the Federal Reserve can do is make loans against collateral.
The banks have accounts with the Fed, much the same way that you have an account in a commercial bank.
I came home from school one day, and there was a phone call for me. And I picked up the phone. They said, 'This is the Harvard Admissions Department. We'd like to let you know that you're accepted in the freshman class.' And I said, 'Come on, who is this really?'
I got into economics because I wanted to make things better for the average person.
I was a professor at Princeton University. And, in that capacity, I studied for many years the role of financial crisis in the economy.
The stress on the financial system in the fall of 2007 was significant, but not so significant as to threaten the overall stability of the U.S. economy, although it did lead to the beginning of a recession at the end of 2007.
In September 2008, the two largest housing mortgage companies called Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were government-sponsored enterprises, which hold hundreds of billions of dollars of mortgages, because of the losses they took on the mortgages, they essentially became insolvent, and the government had to take them over.
There are a number of institutions globally where the Federal Reserve typically leads the U.S. effort to work with financial regulators from other countries, and we try to, to the extent possible, establish international standards for how - the amount of capital a bank should hold, for example, or how much.
In the past, Federal Reserve chairmen have not generally gone directly to the public.
I have spoken about deficits, and I think deficits are important because they address broad economic and financial stability. We need to talk about that.
The biggest downside of my current job is that I have to wear a suit to work. Wearing uncomfortable clothes on purpose is an example of what former Princeton hockey player and Nobel Prize winner Michael Spence taught economists to call 'signaling.'
My proposal that Fed governors should signal their commitment to public service by wearing Hawaiian shirts and Bermuda shorts has so far gone unheeded.
I and others were mistaken early on in saying that the subprime crisis would be contained. The causal relationship between the housing problem and the broad financial system was very complex and difficult to predict.
You want to put the fire out first and then worry about the fire code.
Textbooks describe economics as the study of the allocation of scarce resources. That definition may be the 'what,' but it certainly is not the 'why.'
The ultimate purpose of economics, of course, is to understand and promote the enhancement of well-being.
Aggregate statistics can sometimes mask important information.
We should see better and more direct measurements of economic well being.
As you know, in the latter part of 2008 and early 2009, the Federal Reserve took extraordinary steps to provide liquidity and support credit market functioning, including the establishment of a number of emergency lending facilities and the creation or extension of currency swap agreements with 14 central banks around the world.
Imperfect substitutability of assets implies that changes in the supplies of various assets available to private investors may affect the prices and yields of those assets.
Clear communication is always important in central banking, but it can be especially important when economic conditions call for further policy stimulus but the policy rate is already at its effective lower bound.
As an educator myself, I understand the profound effect that good teachers and a quality education have on the lives of our young people.
Because financially capable consumers ultimately contribute to a stable economic and financial system as well as improve their own financial situations, it's clear that the Federal Reserve has a significant stake in financial education.
If Australia finds it has a strong Australian dollar, and it has higher unemployment, then it would have to respond, and that would either be by increasing domestic demand or by weakening its own currency.
The Libor system is structurally flawed. It is a major problem for our financial system and for the confidence in the financial system. We need to address it.
One would be forgiven for concluding that the assumed benefits of financial innovation are not all they were cracked up to be.
The Fed needs an approach that consolidates the gains of the Greenspan years and ensures that those successful policies will continue - even if future Fed chairmen are less skillful or less committed to price stability than Mr. Greenspan has been.
Given the extent of the exposures of major banks around the world to A.I.G., and in light of the extreme fragility of the system, there was a significant risk that A.I.G.'s failure could have sparked a global banking panic.
A.I.G. was even larger than Lehman, with a substantial presence in derivatives and debt markets, as well as in insurance markets.
A collapse in U.S. stock prices certainly would cause a lot of white knuckles on Wall Street.
After the 1929 crash, the Federal Reserve mistakenly focused its policies on preserving the gold value of the dollar rather than on stabilizing the domestic economy.
The downturn following the collapse of Japan's so-called bubble economy of the 1980s was not as severe as the Great Depression.
Central bankers got it right in the United States in 1987 when they avoided deflationary pressures as well as serious trouble in the banking system.
Low and stable inflation in many countries is an important accomplishment that will continue to bring significant benefits.
After a long period in which the desired direction for inflation was always downward, the industrialized world's central banks must today try to avoid major changes in the inflation rate in either direction.
Deflation can be particularly dangerous when a financial system is shaky, with household and corporate balance sheets in poor shape and banks undercapitalized and heavily burdened with bad loans.
No one will lend at a negative interest rate; potential creditors will simply choose to hold cash, which pays zero nominal interest.
I don't know why there aren't more Depression buffs.
The Depression was an incredibly dramatic episode - an era of stock-market crashes, breadlines, bank runs and wild currency speculation, with the storm clouds of war gathering ominously in the background... For my money, few periods are so replete with human interest.