It's tough for me to draw myself - usually way too self-critical.

Trump is most fun to draw - just a great mash of caricature-able features, from bouffant to eyebrows and scowl, to the high cheekbones and the regal pride.

It's not empirically wrong to say that Washington isn't working for the American people and Washington does too many things for powerful special interests and it's broken.

It is empirically indecent to make fun of the disabled... That's just indecent.

I listen to a lot of criticism. From the Left and the Right and from everywhere. I mean, everybody's a media critic. And sometimes I think it's on point, and other times, I think about it and consider it and then might ultimately disagree with it. But I do listen to it; I really do.

You write a story, you do a TV show, and if people don't like it, well, you're going to do it again tomorrow.

A lot of the stuff I blog is either stuff I'm reporting anyway for ABC News internally and figure I might as well put it up on the blog. Or it's stuff I'm just interested in, or I read about it, or I hear about it, and I'm just curious.

I've always been a ravenous consumer of opinion. When I was in my high school library and my college library, I would read 'National Review' and I would read 'The Nation' and I would read 'The American Spectator' and I would read 'Mother Jones.'

I'm not a member of a political party, and I feel very, very comfortable being independent. Even if I weren't a journalist - if I were doing whatever - I would be an independent.

'MAD Magazine' put out a book that was a collection of Trump cartoons, and they asked me to do the forward because they knew that I was a fan because I'd done stories and tweeted about 'MAD.' So I did the forward and asked them if I could do a cartoon. They let me, and I did caricatures of myself and Wolf Blitzer.

I think there are periods in this country when behavior is abhorrent: McCarthy, Watergate, Bill Clinton. It's just a question of how the checks and balances in the American system work and how leaders stand up to it or don't stand up to it.

I think that I'm doing my job, and it's nice to be recognized, but I also know that a lot of the people who are happy with me now are not going to be happy with me in four to eight years and that I'm just going to keep doing what I'm doing.

What would McCarthy, what would Nixon, what would Bill Clinton have done if they'd had Twitter?

The Patriots cheat. This is just a fact as established by investigations. They're a cheating team.

It matters to people that the president tell them the truth.

There are news sources that are just out-and-out lies coming from Europe, coming from other parts of the world.

You know who has done a lot of questioning of generals? President Trump.

I'm a collaborative person - it makes me better - and sometimes taking that collaboration to Twitter is helpful.

CNN is in the business of sussing out what is true and what is false.

I choose to make it my job to not automatically believe what the U.S. government says.

Nastiness and mockery and meanness sometimes seem as if they're spreading like a contagion.

I think there is room for improvement for all of the media, and that certainly, and especially, includes me.

There's a long tradition in this country of questioning generals.

My job is to be skeptical: skeptical of people like Edward Snowden and skeptical of the U.S. government.